SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (76078)10/1/2003 7:09:48 PM
From: Solon  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
"I meant a proper claim as a matter of justice or natural rights not of law."

Well...that is the point. You and I don't agree on what a "proper claim" is. Therefore we defer to law which represents the grievances of all people. The law takes a dim view of discrimination on the basis of race, colour, gender, or sexual orientation. So do I. And I helped make it so.

"Sure we live in a democracy but that doesn't mean that individuals can't state their opinions and principles or even try to get laws passed supporting those ideas"

I agree.

"I would have thought that this would have gone without saying but apparently it does not."

I would have thought so, too...and I have found no evidence in any posts (other than Jewels's) to indicate otherwise.

"I do not think it makes logical sense to talk about A causing harm to B unless A actually causes something to happen to B."

Don't be silly. If I go into a grocery store and the clerk says that he won't serve me because I am a homosexual--do you think it does me no harm? Do you think if I drive a hundred miles into a city to see a hockey game and the moralist at the door turns me away because I am a woman or a heterosexual that I do not feel harmed??

That is silly. It is easy to harm someone without breaking the law.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext