The point was entirely missed on you. Not unusual.
Let's put it this way>> Say, the CIA has an employee working on WMD proliferation. Let's call her, "Laura Bush." This "Laura Bush," also happens to be the First Lady and wife of the President of the United States.
Now, when "Laura Bush" does her CIA work, she goes by her real name, "Laura Bush." Thus, everyone she deals with knows her as, "Laura Bush," and they also know (through intelligence, which you lack) that she is the wife of the President of the United States.
Are you with me?
Now, let's say that some reporter writes a story and mentions that "Laura Bush," who everyone knows is married to the President of the United States, is also a CIA employee.
Tell me, putz, what "cover" is blown and what "protection" is lost? Do you pukes really think that international terrorists would have divulged confidential information to "Laura Bush," wife of the President of the United States, that they wouldn't have divulged to "Laura Bush," CIA employee? |
