SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JohnM who wrote (10231)10/2/2003 11:46:23 AM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (2) of 793706
 
No, the real question is who committed the clear crime of leaking her name.

No, John, there has been no crime until someone confesses to it, pleads guilty, or is found guilty by a judge or jury. This is a basic legal precept that you seem to forget. It underscores the silly political games that are being played by the Dems in their heat to tar Bush with something. The public has seen all of this foolishness before when the GOP mistakenly went after Clinton for his peccadillos. The voters will punish the Dems for subjecting them to another media-intense pseudo-scandal.

There are lots of non-criminal ways that Novak may have known that she was employed by the CIA--it could have been an open secret in DC; she may have told him; there could have been an innocent disclosure; or, more likely, Novak may have simply put two and two together.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News