SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JohnM who wrote (10314)10/2/2003 2:41:29 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) of 793684
 
I think it was an innocent mistake to release her name. Two things I find interesting. First, I think Dana Priest's story about 6 reporters being called sounds like a separate event from Novak's story. He is such a snake that you can't trust him, but I know how aggressive he is. I suspect he did get this story on his own.

This means that after he got his interviews, the people in the shop knew it was out, and either one of them called the other reporters, or perhaps that part of the story is wrong.

But I think what still fascinates both of us is the identity and motive of this weeks leaker. Doesn't add up yet. Not with Bush's shop, and their passion for "no leaks."

lindybill@leakingleakersandtheleakerswholeakthem.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News