Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neocon who wrote (116117)	10/3/2003 11:42:13 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Everyone did not agree on the degree of danger. There was, in fact, so much disagreement that we were forced to go with our coalition of the rather pathetic willing. And we are now finding out we don't have quite enough willing to get us where we need to go. The "evidence" of a link between Al Q and the "Iraqi regime" is tenuous, and, proves nothing in terms of their danger to us. Of course you could hope that some proof of a real conspiracy to aid Al Q in hurting the US will turn up, if you cared very much about poor Mr. Bush, but right now all you've got is hope. And please, don't think you are running on anything other than hope, at this point. You may get facts at some point, but please, don't count on it. I would be very surprised if Saddam was very interested in helping out an organization that would destroy him, if it became really successful. Saddam just wasn't that stupid.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next