Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: The Philosopher who wrote (76509)	10/6/2003 5:40:18 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) of 82486

So I don't see that it is possible for any significant length of time to operate under the radar to the extent that no targeted person will ever face actual exclusion. <<An issue of conscience should be founded upon some genuine grounds of not wanting to cause harm to self or others. >> That is what Jewel said about conscience. What if he operated under the radar but, at the first instance of having to turn away a client, he did the principled thing and shut down his business rather than harm the client by turning him or her away based on group identity, would that be enough to enable you to tolerate his business practices? If it turns out that there's no way for this guy to operate the way he wants to, then so be it, but I want to make sure first that every option is considered. That's why I'm asking.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next