SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 307.20+2.0%Jan 12 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zonder who wrote (70667)10/6/2003 12:35:34 PM
From: runes  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
RE: "Credible" numbers of Iraqi brutality -

<<Hey, I haven't "rejected" any number.>> Let's see - you labeled my number as "folklore" and a "story". And stated that you would rather have "credible" numbers.
...That may not be an outright rejection but it's pretty damn dismissive.

<<I don't know. I asked. Is that a crime?>>
...No, but the above mentioned follow-up comments were rather rude.

<<Err, me? Debating THE NEED for war?>>
...A pointless semantic diversion. If you prefer - we were debating the lack of a need for war with you on the pro side. And yes, instead of need, I should have used justification.
...But the point still stands - how could you have an opinion on the Iraq war without having some kind of idea about the consequences to the Iraqi people of leaving Saddam in power?

And to the meat of the matter -
...I don't mind if you want to challenge my opinion or even make the occasional snide remark. Such is the nature of these threads.
...But to sit that, ask for "credible" sources on things that are deliberately obscur and then respond by deriding my source (me) while offering nothing of a counter-point - that's just boorish.

And for the record -
...That number in my head is what is known as an internal estimate which I formulated over the last year as the Iraq debate raged on. It didn't come from any single source but is a composite of the myriad of numbers that came up in the debate.
...As an example, look at the Amnesty International report I cited -
web.amnesty.org
<<In October, 23 political prisoners, mainly Shi'a Muslims, were reportedly executed in Abu Ghraib prison.>>
...Now figure at least 5 major prisons (Basra, Mosul, Kirkuk, and two around Baghdad - a reasonable assumption) and 12 months in the year and you are up to about 1200 executions of political prisoners. Add in 50% more for all of the smaller towns and villages (a conservative estimate) and all of a sudden 2000 people seems reasonable.
...Is it really a credible number? No - it is fraught with assumptions starting with AI's credibility and moving on from there. But it is the best that I have to offer.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext