Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (76684)	10/6/2003 6:48:26 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) of 82486

"But his refusal to make even a pretense of accommodation, to even listen to concerns and alternatives wouldn't endear him to anyone. Accommodate what? You want him to stop the mojo scenario. Every other accommodation he has made. listen to concerns... For crying out loud Karen, he has answered EVERY CONCERN that was legitimate. He completely covered the ONE big issue "harm," from every aspect. None of you and yours could answer to his coverage of that concern. He did not listen to accusations that he thinks women and homosexuals are lesser beings and deserve ill treatment because the accusation was unfounded and untrue to the scenario. But you wanted him to answer for his hatred (that didn't exist) anyway. Alternatives...The alternatives were all based on a presumption that he should be recognizing your point of view that he is wrong. "He seems utterly insensitive to the reality that there are clients out there who have interests and principles and feelings as well." Another allegation that has no basis. "He just wants to do things his way and damn the torpedos." You say. However, why is standing up for what he believes in the face of attack a bad thing? "He thinks he's above the law. " I don't consider him in violation of the law and it hasn't been tested. In any event he is no more in violation of the law than women doctors who don't take male patients, which I also don't see as a violation. "And he thinks the whole world revolves around his precious beliefs" I have seen no evidence of that. In fact, it was clearly stated that he has no intentions of changing the profession or other practitioners who practice according to what they believe is best. "He thinks he knows better than his clients what's best for them." Where it is defined by his service to them he should use his judgement to determine if a particular treatment is good for them... Every service provider should. "On top of that, he seems to think he's hot stuff. There is no evidence of that. Another wild flayling accusation. I was thinking of him as humble. You're still confusing the hypo with me. I am not mojo or much like him. You really have not said anything here that is a valid fault of mojo's. I tried to get you to think about what you and yours really hate about him but only recieved hate mail accusing me of personal attacks...hint: send 'em all back to the middle east where they belong. All of the "He thinks" statements are presumptuous and unfounded. It reveals what you think, and feel, and not much else.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next