Weintraub's interview illustrates just how "clueless" the California Democratic Politicians are.
___________________________________
California Insider
A Weblog by
Sacramento Bee Columnist Daniel Weintraub
October 08, 2003
Saving the state 'from ignorance'
Late last night, just before Gray Davis conceded defeat in a gracious speech, I spoke at his event with Sen. Sheila Kuehl, the Santa Monica Democrat who hopes to replace John Burton next year as leader of the state Senate. Kuehl is a partisan liberal, head of the “Progressive PAC” that raises money for leftist Democrats running in legislative primaries. She is also usually level-headed, pleasant, intelligent and courteous. Last night, she was none of the above. Here is an excerpt from our interview:
DW: How are you feeling?
KUEHL: I am really sad. I’m more angry than anything. And I haven’t even started thinking about what the Senate will need to do in order to save the state.
DW: Save the state from what?
KUEHL: From ignorance. This guy has no idea how to run a state. One of two things will happen. He’ll have his own ideas and no way to carry them out. I mean he has already proposed three things that the governor cannot do. He wants to roll back the car tax on his own by fiat, which he can t do. He wants to tax the Indians, which he can’t do. He doesn’t know anything about running the state. So either he will propose a lot of stuff he can’t do and we’ll have to govern, or he’ll be pretty well manipulated by people who have an agenda, very much the way I think the president of the United States has been handled by people who are really telling him how to do these things. In which case we may have to counteract things that are worse than things he proposed on his own. His handlers will probably be more conservative than he is, or in the Republican Party line. Convince him he’ll bring businesses back to the state by cutting more benefits to workers, by unraveling anti-discrimination statutes which they call job killers.
DW: Will he be received civilly by the Democrats in the Legislature?
KUEHL: He will be received civilly. We have received everyone civilly. I don’t know if everybody is going to go to the State of the State (speech). Because frankly I don’t think there is going to be a lot of content that anyone’s interested in. What’s this guy got to say to us about the state of the state? Nothing.
Posted by dweintraub at 09:27 AM
The Schwarzenegger counties
Schwarzenegger won a plurality in 50 of the 58 counties, and took an outright majority in 36 of them. All of the counties where he finished second to Cruz are clustered around San Francisco Bay or around the north and central coasts. His best county was Sutter, the rural county north of Sacramento, where he got a whopping 65 percent of the vote. Interestingly, the better Schwarzenegger did in those counties, the better McClintock did too. In a handful, Tom finished second. Here is the map.
Posted by dweintraub at 07:24 AM
See the map here.
vote2003.ss.ca.gov
California has its own version of the blue-state, red-state breakdown, only here the breakdown comes by counties, and the Secretary of State's map colors them green and red. Just 15 of the state's 58 counties opposed the recall yesterday, and eight of them were on the coast. Six of the remaining seven were either continguous to a coastal county and immediately inland, or touching San Francisco Bay. Yolo County, which was 49.8 percent "yes" as of 6:40 this morning, was the only "inland" county for Gray. And other than Los Angeles County, which was 51 percent "no" on the recall, the southernmost county for Gray was Monterey. I will come back with the precise numbers on this, but it appears that if you took away Los Angeles County and those counties which touch SF Bay, the recall would have passed 60-40, and perhaps by an even greater margin. sacbee.com |
