Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Solon who wrote (77060)	10/9/2003 2:18:18 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) of 82486

"But I gave my opinion that their was no justification for conscience as a defence against overt harm of others. I acknowleged that conscience as a defense has been allowed in the avoidance of participation in war (for instance)." Very lengthy discussions were carried on regarding harm or potential for harm that were specifically related to the mojo hypothetical (the real one, not the one you concocted). No direct harm was ever identified. The best that could be done was by X and Karen in suggesting that there was something insidious that was not visible or felt as harm but their anyway. This view point was never qualified. Likewise, you and chris shouting over the discussion, "mojo's a bigot" has absolutely no basis. Regarding conscientiously objecting to participation as a fighter in war (which I have done during Viet Nam, and also support), we can associate direct harm, since the enemies of our people are waging a deadly battle, killing and maming the people we have an allegiance to, while we sit idly by. Your allegations are false, your reasoning is tainted, your vain and hateful rantings are in the hundreds, and your honor is no where to be seen.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next