Precious and Base Metal Investing Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: E. Charters who wrote (22104)	10/10/2003 5:29:48 AM
From: Michael Bidder	Read Replies (1) of 39344

On the face of it look at what AQI is claiming. They didn't even own the data at the time of the IMA staking. Newmont didn’t care. The data would have represented only a small fraction of the regional data the IMA had collected or bought over the years in the Area. The Newmont data covered a large part if not all of the area of interest of IMA. Is the query by AQI implying that every company that is looking in the area that took a peak at the Newmont data should cease activity? Should IMA have gone on an exploration holiday? The confidentiality didn't ask for that. IMA got lucky. They didn't know what was up the hill. They were looking and they were using data that was their own. The confidentiality provided for an "AREA OF INFLUENCE" AQI is reaching and playing some cheap trick. IMA would have tossed the letter in the trash but for the Financing. You just watch. 1) IMA will drill. 2) Stock will fly. 3) Judge will not take the case. (What case?) AQI will back peddle.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next