Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: greenspirit who wrote (11589)	10/10/2003 10:31:28 AM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) of 793843

Michael, you continue to wish to trivialize sexual harassment, this time by saying Arnold's admitted groping of women (I leap from "I behaved badly on rowdy movie sets" to the more compact form of that which is "groping", which in context was quite clear) was similar what his fans did to him. That, I'm afraid, goes along with your other attempts to trivialize it. I see you agree with me that the legal parts of this issue are simply not known and are unlikely to be so. As for trying to change the subject from Arnold to Clinton, that's hardly funny. The Broderick stuff, as you should know, had so many different versions that no one has any idea what happened. I, for one, believe it was precisely like the black love child stuff. Worse than the proverbial urban myth. Clinton had affairs. Stop. As for whether it dies quickly or not, ask Bob Packwood. These things have a life. At least they did in his case. Will they in Arnold's case? Who knows.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next