SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (77285)10/10/2003 5:38:48 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
In other words, it should be up to the state to demonstrate sufficient reason to abrogate freedom of conscience, not to the person to prove he "deserves" an exemption, except in the limited sense of showing the claim is sincere.

There is a presumption that when the legislature passes a law, it has considered the competing claims of freedom of conscience and social need. That's the deliberative part of a deliberative democracy.

If you are going to give anybody who thinks they have an issue of conscience the right to challeng any law they think infringes on their conscience, you will quickly produce stalemate.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext