SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Castle

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (2148)10/11/2003 5:37:19 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 7936
 
Nation & World: Thursday, September 11, 2003

Bush: Patriot Act needs strengthening

By Dana Milbank
The Washington Post




WASHINGTON — President Bush, in a speech marking today's second anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, called on Congress yesterday to "untie the hands of our law-enforcement officials" by expanding their ability to investigate and detain terrorism suspects.

While hailing the passage of the 2001 USA Patriot Act, which expanded federal police powers, Bush said those changes did not go far enough. He called for empowering authorities in terrorist investigations to issue subpoenas without going to grand juries, to hold suspects without bail and to pursue the death penalty in more cases.

"Under current federal law, there are unreasonable obstacles to investigating and prosecuting terrorism, obstacles that don't exist when law-enforcement officials are going after embezzlers or drug traffickers," Bush said at the FBI Academy in Quantico, Va. "For the sake of the American people, Congress should change the law and give law-enforcement officials the same tools they have to fight terror that they have to fight other crime."

In pressing for an extension of the Patriot Act, Bush plunged into a contentious issue on the eve of the Sept. 11 remembrance. By endorsing an expansion of police powers, the president put himself at odds with some Republican legislators who have joined Democrats in an effort to scale back part of the original Patriot Act.

Opponents said Bush, in launching the offensive, was seeking to blunt an effort to repeal the increased authority the administration won shortly after the 2001 attacks.

"It's clear the administration, now on the defensive, is trying to use offense as a defensive strategy," said Anthony Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union. "The public is saying they've gone too far. Now you have the president and the attorney general asking for additional power."

It was the first time Bush had advocated provisions beyond the Patriot Act, his aides said. In February, a draft of legislation being prepared by the administration included sweeping powers, including the ability to revoke citizenship of terrorism suspects, forbid the release of information about terrorism detainees, and set up a DNA database of people associated with terrorist groups. The House Judiciary Chairman, James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., has said he told Attorney General John Ashcroft then that it would be "extremely counterproductive" to pursue such "Patriot 2" legislation.

Sensenbrenner was neutral on Bush's proposal yesterday.

Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., the ranking Democrat on the committee, said both parties would reject the ideas. "I am confident we will continue to say no until Ashcroft explains why he has abused the power he already has," Conyers said.

Bush aides said the proposals the president backed yesterday, parts of which had already been floating about Capitol Hill, were modest. Bush did not back a provision, suggested earlier by Ashcroft, to expand the authority to pursue those offering "material support" to suspected terrorist cells.




But Bush spokesman Scott McClellan would not rule out the possibility that Bush would back further provisions. "The president is always looking at ways ... that we can better secure the homeland and make America safer, and that's what this is about," he said.

Ashcroft has been touring the country to build support for the original Patriot Act, and the Justice Department has been fighting an amendment passed this summer by the House that would cut off money for warrants for unannounced "sneak-and-peek" searches in terrorism cases, one of the Patriot Act provisions. Congress must consider whether to renew several provisions in 2005.

Specifically, Bush called for allowing "administrative subpoenas," which would allow prosecutors to demand sensitive documents in terrorism cases without court approval. Bush also sought power to deny bail to suspects without proving that they are dangerous. He also proposed extending the death penalty to acts of sabotage that result in death.

"The House and the Senate have a responsibility to act quickly on these matters," Bush said. "Untie the hands of our law-enforcement officials so they can fight and win the war against terror."

Georgetown University law professor David Cole, an opponent of extending the Patriot Act, said the three items "aren't the worst parts of Patriot 2." But he said that the bail provision would allow the government to hold people suspected of "wholly nonviolent activity," and that the use of administrative subpoenas, though common in civil cases, rejects the "basic idea that criminal investigations ought to proceed by virtue of a grand jury."

Copyright © 2003 The Seattle Times Company

Search archive
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext