I've probably read more Shadow Government stuff than many of the regular theorists here. I've also studied the JFK cover-up fairly extensively and the surprising history of the Bush family and its connections to Saudi and other Arab oil interests. So, I know there is much that has been hidden and not explained in our relatively recent history. I agree that all this stuff should be totally open to the public and that this nation will never achieve true greatness until it stops trying to cover up stuff, especially the VietNam War fiasco.
However, even with that as background, there is no way that 9/11 was anything other than what NORMAL logic says it was. It was open, notorious, on tv, visual, etc. It was preceded by similar lesser attacks by the same terrorists. OBL, his associates, his underlings, etc., etc., have all bragged about it. To deny this, is, as my facetious posts have indicated, to deny just about anything and support that denial, no matter how ridiculous, by internet blogs and sources of ill repute.
People that say OBL tapes are not him are just deluding themselves and harming the cause of finding the truth. Denying the money trail, the notes, the photos, the images, etc., etc., again is saying we live in the Matrix and takes away from finding the truth.
As a cynic of governmental activities, I actually think that the bizarro world theories espoused here hurt those who are seeking the truth about "shadow government" if that in fact exists and I'm not saying it doesn't in some form. The normal logical rationale thinker reads the type of stuff espoused here and lumps all conspiracy theorists into the "nut job" category, on a level below those who feel NASA did not go to the moon in the late 1960's.
This is all my opinion. You have the right to your opinions and I hope that you come to the truth. But, arguing off the wall theories actually hurts the cause of finding the truth. |
