SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tom Clarke who wrote (12045)10/13/2003 8:33:08 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (1) of 793640
 
Sabato Fears Trend Set by 'LA Times' Series
Calls Schwarzenegger Allegations 'Piling On'

By Joe Strupp
OCTOBER 13, 2003

NEW YORK -- The Los Angeles Times' decision to publish several articles revealing sexual harassment allegations against Arnold Schwarzenegger just days before the California recall election will make it easier for other newspapers to report potentially damaging information closer to Election Day, predicted Larry Sabato, a leading political scholar. He condemned the Times stories as a case of "piling on."

"The fact that it happened has set a precedent of airing tough allegations three or four or five days before an election," Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, told E&P Online. "The timing was a problem. Hitting people with allegations that generate a strong emotional response that affects the vote should be done only in extreme cases."

Times Editor John Carroll could not be reached for comment Friday.

Sabato's comments were in response to the Times series that ran Oct. 2-5 detailing allegations from 15 women claiming that Schwarzenegger had either touched them inappropriately or otherwise sexually harassed them. The series started with a story that included allegations from six women, but named only two.

"I didn't have a problem with the first [story's] allegations, but I had a problem with the follow-ups," Sabato said. "They were not properly vetted -- that is where the sloppiness creeps in." He added that the charges published in follow-up stories were too close to the Oct. 7 election date to allow proper time for a response. "These were women whose comments were taken at face value who should not have been," Sabato said. "There is a tendency to pile on and keep the story your own. I think it hurts credibility."

But he agreed that the unusual nature of the recall election, which included only about two months of campaigning, made it more difficult to spend a lengthy amount of time on the reporting. "This was a campaign in dog years," Sabato said. "It was highly compressed."

Source: Editor & Publisher Online

Joe Strupp (jstrupp@editorandpublisher.com) is associate editor for E&P.


mediainfo.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext