SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Munch-a-Biotech Today

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Biomaven who wrote (1597)10/13/2003 10:20:54 AM
From: RCMac  Read Replies (1) of 3158
 
Not sure if they'd need a filing if they exceed 5% [of the convertibles] though.

No 13D filing necessary, since Sec. 13d applies only to equity securities:

"Reports by persons acquiring more than five per centum of certain classes of securities

Any person who, after acquiring directly or indirectly the beneficial ownership of any equity security of a class which is registered pursuant to section 12 . . . is directly or indirectly the beneficial owner of more than 5 per centum of such class shall, within ten days after such acquisition, send to the issuer of the security at its principal executive office, by registered or certified mail, send to each exchange where the security is traded, and filed with the Commission, a [Form 13D]."

law.uc.edu

Here's SEC rule 13d-1(a):

"Any person who, after acquiring directly or indirectly the beneficial ownership of any equity security of a class which is specified in paragraph (i) of this section, is directly or indirectly the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the class shall, within 10 days after the acquisition, file with the Commission, a statement containing the information required by Schedule 13D."

law.uc.edu

As for Jonathan's reasonable caution about the "creeping tender offer" rules, as I recall these are judicial glosses on Section 14d and the SEC rules under it, necessary to carry out the intent of those statutory provisions or some such reasoning.

But Sec. 14d and the rules under it seem also to be confined to "equity securities". Accordingly, it would be a pretty long stretch to bring the quiet accumulation of far-out-of-the-money convertible securities under that doctrine. (Not beyond what some lawyers might argue, but unlikely to be a winner, IMO.)

Sec. 14d: law.uc.edu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext