SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: smolejv@gmx.net who wrote (39559)10/13/2003 1:35:00 PM
From: AC Flyer  Read Replies (2) of 74559
 
DJ:

You are reiterating the doomster-oriented assumption that the BLS employment statistics are undercounting the unemployed.

I suggest the opposite is true - during recoveries from recessions the BLS systematically undercounts the number of employed, thus making the BLS-generated unemployment rate unnecessarily pessimistic.

I have attached a CSFB report that lays out the reasons for this persistent bias. Here is the much-simplified Cliff's Notes version. The BLS uses two different surveys for measuring employment - the Establishment Survey and the Household Survey. The Establishment Survey is based on actual payrolls at existing businesses. The data from this survey are more quickly processed and form the basis of the BLS's preliminary employment reports. However, the Establishment Survey totally ignores the farm sector, the self-employed and more importantly, new businesses. The Household Survey includes these sectors. Recessions seed a process of creative destruction in the labor market and so, while many jobs permanently disappear through structural changes in the economy, many new businesses and many new jobs are created. When the Household Survey data is reconciled with the Establishment Survey, these new jobs are counted (estimated) and the employment data are revised upwards.

At a minimum, take a look at Chart 2 on page 2 of the attachment, which shows a significant divergence between the Establishment Survey and the Household Survey since early 2002. Part of the divergence results from a non-back-dated change in methodology for the Household Survey, but even so, there is a significant discrepancy between the employment pictures painted by the two surveys.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext