SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: The Philosopher who wrote (77477)10/13/2003 2:35:01 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
"What harm?" Has been the salient question to answer for over a month now. Karen remarks that Jewel keeps insisting that there is no harm. She is right. I cannot imagine legitimate harm being perpetrated by someone operating under a legitimate claim of "freedom of conscience," in direct response to that claim.

The question has not been answered nor do I believe that it can be. Most of the harm attributed to mojo has nothing to do with his believe statement. It has to do with negative personality components and conduct that his opponents attribute to him, usually through extrapolation.

Message 19396332

It's possible that the reason all of the attempts to find an example break down is that the two things are incompatible... legitimate claim of freedom of conscience and legitimate claim of harm being caused by that legitimate claim of freedom of conscience.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News