Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (77488)	10/13/2003 4:18:26 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) of 82486

I want to clarify: under the circumstances, even if Mojo has a right to refuse service to females, he does not have a right to cause someone to rely upon a contract with him, knowing that there is an impediment to fulfillment. Therefore, it all turns on how responsible he is for the confusion. Since he did not solicit the business, and the name could easily be mistaken as masculine, I am not sure that he has any liability, but I suppose an argument could be made that if he books under those circumstances, he ought to exercise more care than was shown. Anyway, it is not structured so that freedom of conscience is relevant as a defense........

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next