SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Peach who wrote (111)8/10/1997 12:16:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell   of 9818
 
Re: How I would argue the "defective" cash register case

First off, good find by Bill.

I think the case would not boil down to the "defect" in the cash register itself, but rather the manufacturer's attempts to fix the problem.

First I would have to show that a software "bug" in the cash register was no different than a mechanical part breaking. For example, why should a programmer's attempts to "cut corners" and not account for the year 2000 be any different than an engineer doing the same to produce a less durable but cheaper part?

Therefore, unless covered under warranty, the manufacturer is under no obligation to fix the problem unless the customer is willing to pay the price for the part and/or labor. If covered under warranty, then it's simply a question of whether the manufacturer made a good faith effort to fix whatever problem was reported.

Bottom line, IMO: if Y2K software problems are treated like mechanical problems, then related lawsuits will be dramatically diminished since such problems will simply be viewed as yet another example of "planned obsolescense".

- Jeff

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext