Peter:
Your statement that these articles are "just reporters remembering BreX and telling the public to beware" ploughs new ground in the area of absurdity. They do not have to intricately twist the facts, cleverly abuse the English language, attribute to innocent people statements they did not make, omit all vital positive information, and generally tell a crock of lies, in order to caution the public. This is not some redneck country editor we are discussing-- this is Reuters and WSJ, vast international organizations who have the ear of the whole investment WORLD. Why are you here defending them, misrepresenting what they have done, and implying that AIPN may be another BreX? As pointed out by Bouhafa, when Danialle Weaver apparently wrote an objective, fair article, THEY FIRED HER, then still tried to identify her with their exercise in journalistic whoredom. Moreover, BreX is NOT, repeat NOT a metaphor for for AIPN. There is NO similarity, NONE. They know it,and you know it. Are you a stockholder? What, sir, is your purpose here? Are you just another boy scout humanitarian? Are you short the stock? You certainly do not have the excuse of illiteracy, and can read and comprehend those vicious articles as well as anyone. Speak up and stop insulting everyone's intelligence. |
