Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: carranza2 who wrote (116859)	10/14/2003 6:54:00 PM
From: Noel de Leon	Read Replies (1) of 281500

I don't discount the problem with Iran and North Korea. Just as I don't trivialize the Al-Qaeda problem. What both articles failed to do was address the fact that if Iran were to attack Europe it would be attacking it's source of wealth, those countries that pay for it's oil. This would be counter productive. Iran may well want to attack Israel. So I would expect a pre-emptive strike by either Israel or the US. Which would greatly annoy even greater numbers of Moslems(is that possible?). An Iranian counter move could be a non-agression pact between Israel (similar to that between the USSR and Germany prior to WWII) and Iran.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next