Commander Resources Ltd Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Commander Resources Ltd

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: kidl who wrote (100)	10/15/2003 6:16:29 PM
From: VAUGHN	Read Replies (3) of 169

Hello kidl That was an incredibly over the top NR heading - "Spectacular Nickel Grade." The fact is those intercepts were incredibly narrow and the highest grade of 11% NI was hit on an intercept of less than half what Teck drilled on NAI's SVB claims in 1996. The next closest grade of around 6% was on an equally narrow intercept and the remainder of mostly typical 1% Ni grade were all still on very narrow intercepts of no more than 3m. If that is what is found at SVB I would have to call it very VERY disappointing. Mines are made with intercepts of 10's of meters at a minimum... The Pd and Pt grades were nice and would contribute to the bottom line, but they were still very modest and much lower than what PFN has been hitting of late at River Valley and again over very VERY narrow intersections whereas PFN was reporting intercepts of almost 50 meters! In that remote local, I don't see a great deal of potential yet for DML and believe that SVB holds a great deal more. Oh, and yes, no complaints about DDN's news or bump today and the fact that CMD owns a good sized chunk should nicely support the share price until we hear SVB results. Regards Vaughn

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next