SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 228.68-2.7%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Fred Levine who wrote (70703)10/16/2003 11:54:36 AM
From: runes   of 70976
 
<<You have also mistated my position vis a vis Saddam.>>
...I'm not sure where this is coming from. Are you saying that you didn't support attacking Iraq despite the lack of UN support?

<<What has been proven is that Saddam himself was a weapon of mass destruction.>>
...In a figurative sense - but that wasn't proven by recent events - that had been well established many years ago.

<<...the essence of paranoia is the belief that someone is out to get us.>>
...No - it is the IRRATIONAL belief. Believing that Al Qaida is out to get us is not paranoia, it is a fact - one that was known long before 9-11 (and one that Bush failed to address until after 9-11).
...However the fear that Saddam was out to get us does wander into the realm of the irrational. We already had a stranglehold on his purse-strings and inspectors searching the nooks and crannies and we have the biggest army and we are already on heightened alert. And yet, according to the latest administration rationalization - we had to get him before he got us.
...That sounds like paranoia to me!

For the record - I don't believe that the administration attacked Iraq out of paranoia - it was done for political/idealogical reasons. However they did exploit fear and paranoia of the citizenry.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext