WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mephisto who wrote (5501)	10/16/2003 12:14:42 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) of 10965

Kerry has been 100% right about Iraq, not 100% pro war. Lieberman and Gephardt WERE pro-war. They were at the Rose Garden signing patting Bush on the back. Kerry was making speeches warning Bush that if he abused this power he'd be held accountable, that he had to fulfill his promises to go the Un route and use war only as a last resort. Kerry's always been for war as a last resort and only with a broad coalition and a smart post-war plan. Dean had the luxury of staying home watching the war debates on TV. He didn't have to make a difficult choice on it. He can just be a monday morning quarterback and criticize later. Kennedy has a right to criticize. He too had to make the difficult choice. He voted against the war. Dean didn't have to vote on anything. Dean's tax and war stances are just as liberal as Kennedy, perhaps more so. Wanting to do away with the middle clas tax cuts is about as liberal as you get. If he were nominated, Bushies could get away with calling hm "socialist". Kennedy does back Kerry strongly, but they dont always agree on issues.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next