Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (77657)	10/16/2003 9:44:32 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) of 82486

"It is harmful." "I have not said it is not harmful. I have asked you repeatedly to tell us how Moho is damaged if someone inadvertently gets slightly aroused (regardless of gender). All of us are harmed all day long in myriad ways. Harm does not justify a freedom of conscience exemption or excuse harming others through discrimination. The question is being asked in order to pick your brain and find out what you can possibly be talking about. The issue itself was settled a month ago, as you well know. What is the nature of Moho's harm? He is not harmed by massaging a homosexual who does not get aroused. So why all this excitement about the miniscule possibility that someone might be aroused--and what business is it of his? Why is he even looking for signs of arousal? Why not just do his reluctant job, collect his money, and go home and eat?"

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next