SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Abgenix, Inc. (ABGX)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mopgcw who wrote (282)10/17/2003 8:28:24 PM
From: Miljenko Zuanic  Read Replies (2) of 590
 
George,

Sure that 100M is enough for ABGX work, on AZ's targets. Usually, bios develop this on their own, and than sell to pharma, big bucks. 36 targets is big number, the biggest the number the less likely something is near term. For current ABGX, this is good deal (good partner and field covered with future works), but my question is COULD ABGX do better? Can they generate targets with CRGN, invest their own money and generate higher profit down the road?

W was talking (few months back) about 50-50 deal for early stage candidates-programs. This is not one of them. Are they short on cash, and manufacturing start-up is consuming more $$$ than they projected? I guess so. So, somewhere else cats were necessity. That is what I do not like. IF there is serious PROGRESS with ABX-EGF Mr. Market would be generous with cash infusion, and ABGX would be able to do many things on their own. We known that MLNM APETITE and PRIDE were TOO BIG, and they paid price. ABGX do not need to have MLNM appetite, but to generate profitable company they NEED drugs on its own. Not 5-10% royalty stream, imo.

Miljenko
PS: I am not that negative on ABGX, only trying to point that risk did increase recently, jimho.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext