SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (13024)10/19/2003 3:15:52 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) of 793697
 
I am a movie buff, and have been following the Oscar reforms with interest. A major move was the decision to stop CD distribution of the Films under consideration. From a critic's Blog. Ya gotta love his title.
________________________________________

LA Crix Nix Pix Prix


Even a sleeping dog can bite now and then. The Los Angeles Film Critics Association, of which yours truly is a member, voted Saturday to cancel its awards for 2003.
The cause was the Motion Picture Association of America’s decision to ban screeners (video and DVD editions of the year’s film releases) from distribution to voters in the Motion Picture Academy and the various critics organizations which award annual prizes.

While no critic would dispute the right of a filmmaker to withhold his or her film from such distribution, the problem is that the major studios are using their muscle to make it a blanket prohibition. Independent films, which can only muster a few play dates even when they are commercially successful, can’t come close to matching the reach of even mid-range studio features, which puts them at a severe disadvantage.

This disadvantage appears terribly convenient for the majors, so much so that the executives at the divisions of the majors which handle independent, foreign, and other specialty features (Fox Searchlight, Paramount Classics, Sony Classics, Miramax, and so forth) have raised their voices in loud protest.

The L.A. critics don’t like being manipulated into a corner by this policy. Of course it would be best to see every movie on the big screen. But in the years since screeners have become common, the number of films released per year has increased by 33%. You just can’t see everything. Moreover, as the year draws to an end, critics like to go over films from earlier in the year for second or even third viewings, especially when considering categories such as best score, production design, and certainly the two supporting actor slots.

The cancellation is contingent on the MPAA’s rescinding the screener policy. If it goes, the cancellation goes. But the crucial word is “rescind.” Not alter or modify. Rescind.

henrysheehan.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext