Commander Resources Ltd Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Commander Resources Ltd

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: VAUGHN who wrote (111)	10/21/2003 8:55:55 PM
From: jamesien	Read Replies (1) of 169

I certainly hope your investment can average 3.5% Ni but that would be an unheard of grade as no mine in the world to my knowledge averages such a figure. We feed the mill here with 3% Ni ore, and it may be lower in a near future. If CMD/DML/FL can find such grade at SVB over mineable width (3 meters at least), that will be a very good news IMO. What KNP have already just need follow-up to see the size of the orebodies. I would not be surprised to see it in a 250Kt to 750Kt range for each, and together easily over 1 million tons. A 2,5% to 3,5% range is what I expect also. As it seem partly on surface, we don't need it to be too high-grade. Elevated PGE's are typically only found when Cu grades run higher in Komatitic ore such as is found in the Raglan area. I agree 100%. I believe it give you an idea of the problems with Novawest results. Copper and PGM's are associated without nickel there, so I guess they find only remobilized copper sulphides and no important magmatic system. I always welcome informed discussion and look forward to your input as your time allows. Same thing for you, I appreciate this. Thinking about a possible hit on SVB, trading on NAI is way too quiet, do you agree? Jamesien

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next