This idea, that non-violent resistance only works against "humane" rulers, is a variation on the theme of calling pacifists cowards.
All the rulers of the Soviet Empire were brutal thugs, with a long history of killing to maintain their authority. This was true, right up to the end.
Satyagraha works by convincing enough of the ruler's subjects to stop taking the ruler's orders. It is assumed the ruler may be willing to use every available lever of power, to maintain his regime. When the ruler's self-confidence finally cracks, it happens precisely because he sees his orders no longer being obeyed, he realises he is not feared any longer.
In war, you win by breaking the discipline, command structure, and unit cohesion of your opponent's armed forces. Satyagraha does the same thing, but without killing the opponent or his followers. Successful Satyagraha takes as much discipline, and is as risky, as making war. |
