Re: "Huh? The White House has admitted that the info was not correct and reported erroneously."
No, not so. The White House admitted no such thing. You have a problem in logic, if you believe words from the White House ever amounted to such. Not even Wilson himself said he knows it was false, only that he couldn't verify it beyond the one original source(who has not changed his testimony that it IS true, to our knowledge).
Re: "I will not let you have it both ways."
If you understood the rules of logic, you would know I did not even try to. Knowing there is a high likelihood we'll be attacked again even if we don't fight back, does not preclude one from believing that fighting back can "slow and/or even fully prevent further attacks on our soil." Also, when I say fighting back can "slow and/or even fully prevent further attacks on our soil," it does not preclude my belief that we may be attacked again despite the fact that we have fought back.
Re: "Like I said, this is a public forum and all your words are available to be read. Its you that can't seem to stay focus and not me"
I realize, from reading your comments, that you think so(it is sad testimony, indeed).
Re: "Speculation(that Saddam is known to have had WMD)........that's all it was."
You seem singularly unaware of and/or incapable of correctly representing, well-accepted reality. It is U.N. verified fact(as has been recognized by even France and Germany all along).
Dan B. |
