SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members!
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: SI Bob who wrote (19768)10/23/2003 10:01:00 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 32917
 
Your post I believe is clear and obvious libel of my good name. I don't know what personal information you have in all your files, but stating I have been suspended 8 times in the past is clearly dishonest on your part. I am amazed that you would ever disclose such private administration info at all. But posting grossly wrong information is mind boggling.

I am assuming of course you are not counting that fact that I may be banned by individuals from their moderated threads where I have never even posted once and in their header they talk about giving a person a chance and a warning etc... LOL...

I read #reply-19287181 and as I understood it I followed it.

As I followed it I concluded based upon your actions that
You decided to abandon completely the President George W. Bush thread and I guess you felt that #reply-19287181 clearly indicated that.

But you see I read this line in that post.
Personal attacks, such as calling each other pinheads, morons, etc will be treated as non-violations from this point forward in this thread, but other violations such as vulgarity, threats, and invasion of privacy will be dealt with much more severely.

I don't see what I referred to in an earlier post, the idea of totally abandoning. I brought to your attention posts I felt were violations such as vulgarity, threats, and invasion of privacy. I and other have suggested solutions that would keep the integrity of the TOU in place and eliminate your problems with administration.

For doing that I am accused of wanting your help to defeat pinheads and morons etc... LOL I type lousy but I seldom screw up the facts will such silly interpretation. And those five posts you referenced and all my posts are all in the category of pinheads, morons etc. And post about lies is simply reflecting the words of that poster to me back on that poster. I believe all posts I have brought to you attention contained vulgarity or a personal attack on a person's religion or religious beliefs, or sexual orientation.

You say I am warned for the last time. Well in my opinion every point you made makes no logical sense at all. I have asked for clear and transparent explanations of what the rules are. It is my opinion that the TOU published and as amended for the PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH thread by #reply-19287181 do not reflect the actions you are taking.

For all my actions, suggesting I was looking to you for some help in a petty defeat of a few idiots who post on SI reflects very badly on you. I have stated as clearly as I could what I thought was honorable and looked for a way to have a clearly defined rational logical and simple TOU policy.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News