SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (117598)10/24/2003 2:50:35 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Obviously true or we would not have kept them up for 10 years. What happened was a change in the risk/reward profile we were willing to accept. This Bush wanted more than his father did. Again, the issue is not that the sanctions were not producing the results we wanted. The issue is that we changed our minds about what we wanted Bush did not put it in debate as to how best to achieve these new wants. For example, IMO, Bush Sr. was perfectly happy to have Saddam keep Iraq in tact without him being a threat to his neighbors. Obviously Jr. had different ideas.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News