SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: stockman_scott who wrote (30481)10/24/2003 10:05:12 PM
From: Rick Faurot  Read Replies (1) of 89467
 
Bad Blood Between Pentagon, Congress Burns Boeing

Fri October 24, 2003 06:48 PM ET
By Jim Wolf

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Bad blood between the U.S. Congress and the Pentagon has taken a toll on Boeing Co.'s multibillion-dollar drive to lease jetliners to the Air Force as refueling planes, congressional officials and private analysts said on Friday.

The Boeing issue laid bare growing strains between Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and his top lieutenants, on the one hand, and the two most powerful Republicans on the Senate Armed Services Committee, on the other.

Among other things, the chill reflects pique at what officials on both sides of the aisle deem Rumsfeld's sometimes-dismissive approach to Congress, for instance on the situation in post-war Iraq.

But it also reflects perceived slights to Armed Services Committee Chairman John Warner of Virginia, Congress's top overseer of the Defense Department, and the panel's second-ranking Republican, John McCain of Arizona.

The tanker lease has become "a focal point of a dysfunctional relationship between the Pentagon and Congress," said Richard Aboulafia of the Fairfax, Virginia-based Teal Group, an aerospace consultancy. "It's no longer about the tanker requirement or the virtues of leasing. It's about politics and egos."

Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, for instance, spurned on Wednesday a McCain request for Boeing lease-related records of Air Force Secretary James Roche and Michael Wynne, the Pentagon's acting top weapons buyer.

Lawmakers, Wolfowitz wrote, had already received a "balanced picture" of the lease decision -- the first to rent rather than buy a major weapons system -- through testimony and responses to previous congressional queries.

McCain, in a telephone interview, said he was examining all options to obtain the records. Among the possibilities, he said, was persuading a majority of the Commerce Committee he heads to issue a subpoena .

Another, he said, was "to hold up nominations" -- by implication, the Armed Service Committee's long-delayed action on Roche's nomination by President Bush to be the next Army secretary and Wynne's nomination to be the next assistant secretary of defense for acquisition.

Warner hit back at the Pentagon, in effect, on Thursday when he unveiled a hybrid proposal calling for the lease of no more than 20 modified Boeing 767s, one-fifth the number sought by the Air Force and the Pentagon. Another 80 could be acquired through standard purchase practices, he said.

"While on occasion we have our differences, Secretary Rumsfeld and I continue to work closely to support the president and the men and women of the armed forces," Warner said in a statement Friday.

The Senate Armed Services Committee was the only one of four congressional oversight panels that has declined to approve the lease of 100 -- a deal potentially worth more than $21 billion, including purchases at the end of the leases.

"We conducted extensive oversight of this tanker-lease program," Warner said on the Senate floor, supported by the panel's ranking Democrat, Carl Levin of Michigan, and McCain.

Significantly, Warner pointed out, he had initially suggested leasing up to 25 aircraft and buying 75 -- numbers he had modified to 20 and 80, to the detriment of Boeing, the Pentagon's No. 2 supplier.

Rather than seek any middle ground, Wolfowitz had stuck to the idea of leasing 100 767s. The greater the number of leased aircraft, the more the deal would cost taxpayers, nonpartisan Congressional auditors found.

"It's come back to haunt them," a Senate aide said of the Pentagon's disregard for the initial, lease 25-buy 75 compromise put forward by Warner and Levin.

In addition, Warner's new plan would rule out any upfront payments to Boeing for the 767s until they are delivered, just as would have been the case under the lease-100 proposal.

As a result, no money would change hands until fiscal 2006 when the company would get $48 million for the lease of four, followed by $465 million in 2007 for 16 more.

The Air Force would then start buying 20 planes a year from 2008 through 2011 at about $3.7 billion a year -- provided the Air Force and Congress can come up with at least $5 billion in previously unearmarked funds to pay for them by then.

Chicago-based Boeing has lobbied hard for more than a year for the lease program, which would help offset a sharp drop in demand for its commercial aircraft since Sept. 11, 2001.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext