SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan B. who wrote (480377)10/25/2003 5:53:38 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
Re: "O wise one, I responded to that yesterday"
In fact, no you didn't. You had incorrectly implied Osama WOULD NOT have had Iraq on his talking points list, when we all know he in fact LONG HAS.

You are truly becoming the worst kind of lying double talker, IMO.


Next you will be telling us that OBL and Saddam were in cahoots together.....best buddies hanging out at the mosque together.

Whether OBL or not OBL had Iraq on his talking points since 1998 [and I have yet to see proof of that], what difference does it make? If anything, the pre emptive attack on Iraq has made OBL's convictions just that much stronger.

To whit, the Islamic terrorist group, Ansar al-Islam, has grown in strength according to your fave, D. Rumsfeld, since we attacked Iraq:

usatoday.com

Of course, in your brilliant take on things, you said those "elements" that OBL has been fighting for in Iraq are a "bit under the weather":

Message 19414842

Who's right? You or Rumsfeld? Sorry Charlie, but as much as I dislike him, I guess I will have to go with Rumsfeld. What else do you know little about? You really are starting to disappoint.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext