SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: American Spirit who wrote (5827)10/26/2003 12:39:55 AM
From: Original Mad Dog  Read Replies (1) of 10965
 
You Repubs are really terrified of Kerry and Clark, I know. But don't take it out on the rest of us who support them.

I live in the heartland (I got the impression that you live in California, not the heartland, but maybe I'm wrong about that -- I don't know it for a fact so I won't state it as true). I am not a member of any political party. I have voted for members of both parties many times, including for President.

I am taking out on you your complete disrespect of facts. You complain that I spend lots of time looking things up (all of which show that what you have said is false). Yet in reality I spend very little time looking things up. Here are two sites for you, ones you have apparently never heard of.

www.yahoo.com

www.google.com

Each has a search box. For example, if you type in something like "New Hampshire primary winners" in that box, you will quickly have a link to sites that tell you who won each New Hampshire primary for the past half century or more. Or, if you type in "California budget statistics" or "California state spending", it won't take long to find a link that shows you that Gray Davis enabled a state spending culture like none ever seen before in any state in America. If you type in "Michael Moore" and some synonyms for the word "truthful" you will find that Michael Moore's acquaintance for the truth is about as remote as yours is, which is to say, he isn't even in the same neighborhood as the truth a lot of the time. (He is very funny, however.)

Of course, if you checked out what you were about to say before you just spit it out, you might have to reduce the volume of your postings to spend those couple of minutes each time looking up what you're about to say to see whether it's true. You would also have to change the content of a large number of your posts, because you would know them to be false.

It would be a dramatic change for you, I know, but you just might try it, if even for a few days. When it's all over, people might even listen to you once in awhile instead of what they do now.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext