SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (78405)10/27/2003 6:46:57 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
I didn't quote you out of context intentionally. I didn't understand what you were saying. The sentence structure was awkward so I guess I just interpreted it as agreement. Rather than ask you to restate your argument, I'll just give you mine.

One could be a libertarian and anti-abortion for the same reasons anyone is anti-abortion--because it's the killing of a person, something with a soul, which is a religious construct. That would make it appropriate for the state to intervene in the medical decisions of the woman since there are two people at issue.

One could be an atheist and anti-abortion for the reasons you suggest.

If one were both an atheist and libertarian, though, the personhood thing is out so the only reason to be against it is the icky thing. Icky and the rest of the things you mentioned are not sufficient basis to overcome the libertarian reluctance to intrude on a woman's liberty.

Being both atheist, sort of, and libertarian, I think I have a pretty good feel for this.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext