SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (177144)10/27/2003 9:56:41 PM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (3) of 1575707
 
We were attacked, you know?

Not by Iraq. The Iraq aim was set long before 9/11. You continue to repeat this distortion as often as you do your slur of liberal intellect.

Perhaps you're unaware of it, but there is general consensus that the failure in Vietnam was due largely to one problem: The liberal presidents were so chickensh*t to commit all the resources needed to win the war, that they ended up killing 58,300 American soldiers, a little at a time.

You obviously don't know what you are talking about. Four months after Nixon took office, the total number of troops committed to Vietnam reached its peak of 540,000 during the first four months of Nixon's tenure. In his first year of his term however, Nixon did what the Democrats had refused to do, which is the beginning of the withdrawal of US troops. Of the 58,000 casualties, 36,000 occurred under Kennedy's and Johnson's watch. The rest came under Nixon. If you study the Vietman war, you will find that it was a bipartisan war in all respects. Nixon had five years to win it and couldn't.

Al
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext