Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Solon who wrote (78310)	10/28/2003 10:42:46 AM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 82486

If dragons are defined in such a way as to just be another unremarkable reptile such as a large snake then they very well could exist but that existence is not particularly significant. That wasn't the definition I was using when I said "There is evidence against for example the existence of dragons on earth." If OTOH you are defining a dragon as something with supernatural powers and a lack of natural limitations and assert that it uses those powers to hide itself or to survive in a place where it would leave no evidence for us to see (in space, deep under ground, at the bottom of the ocean, on some sort of alternate dimension or parallel universe, ect.) then I will agree that there is no real evidence against the existence of this sort of dragon. "Dragon" by this definition would be a supernatural thing. We don't have any scientific evidence for or against the supernatural. By definition the supernatural is outside of science. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next