SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DMaA who wrote (14198)10/28/2003 11:56:32 AM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (2) of 793781
 
If these are the true facts

and that is for the justice system to decide.

obviously, dma, we don't have all the facts, but the prosecutor and the judge decided there was sufficient evidence to bind the case over for trial

my point wrt the estrich article was that she seemed to be saying she's a "bad victim" because she so neatly fits within the nuts and sluts "defense" not necessarily that there was insufficient evidence.....the very thing that the "rape shield" law was designed to prevent.

that being a person's prejudice either overtly or subconsciously tends toward the idea that woman is not likely to be credible if a rape is reported by her and she falls into either category
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News