DAN, WOULD YOU LIKE TO REITERATE THAT I AM 200,000 SHARES SHORT THIS STOCK? WOULD YOU LIKE TO REITERATE THAT I HAVE EVER BEEN SHORT 1 SHARE OF THIS STOCK?
IT IS A LIE, SLANDER, DECEIT ON YOUR PART. ITS NO WONDER IN THE LAW SUIT THAT MTXX HAS ASKED ME TO GIVE UP MY ILLGOTTEN GAIN.
THE ONLY POSITION I HAVE HAD IN MTXX IS THE ONE SHARE I OWN. DISCLOSURE: Member 5015316
WHAT ARE THE ODDS OF GUESSING WHICH BROKERS HAD A CLIENT WHICH SOLD 10,000 SHARES OF STOCK?
IT WOULD BE ONE IN A MAKEMILLIONS
Re: ND ND but why? Why so many ND
by: makemilns (38/M) 07/08/03 01:50 pm
Msg: 81337 of 84489
It is illegal for me to know why someone holding this stock sold it?? lol That's one of your funnier attempts, Floyd. I know why the client sold stock because I called J Gunn personally and he told me. Is it illegal for me to talk to J Gunn too, you idiot? You pepole are a joke and are getting ready to pay for your stupidity. All you have to do is look at the financial statements, growth in sales and earnings, projections, and valuation to conclude that this stock is worth a lot more, and that you are stupid for shorting 200,000 shares at about 7.
The trade printed below the bid because it was large compared to the average daily volume, and the client was willing to take a little less to get the trade done quickly. Are you mad that you didn't buy even one share of the 10,000? You are equally stupid for suggesting that a person should hang around just because of an investment in any company. I can hear this person telling his boss that he can't move because he wants to wait until a stock he owns goes up. lol
<So, you work for GunnAllen.>
No I don't work for GunnAllen, stupid. |
