Re: "You actually believe that John Kerry supports Saddam Hussein?"
What ever gave you that idea? Boortz didn't say that, and neither did McNutt. You still have a terrible reading comprehension problem which is affecting your ability to interpret meaning. Your problem is that your prejedice makes you lazy, lazy, lazy. What is suggested, for your information, is that Democrats appease, and that notion is as demonstrable as Boortz made it plain(historical record, no less, if certainly not all of it(Johnson pushed Nam, and other better examples not withstanding). The belief is that appeasment doesn't actually attain peace at times, this being one. Democrats & many Libertarians in particular, feel the need for peace strongly, but the suggestion here is that there are times when war begets peace. It is simply obvious that Saddam's interest would be served by our withdrawal, i.e. appeasment. It is also obvious that his is an element which will wreak havoc upon us if left to grow strong. At least this is all obvious to those of us who are supporting protecting you from folks you purport to KNOW are assholes who will kill us if they can(and again, being strong means they better can, and they won't get weak of their own accord - not in regard to terrorizing us). You can repeat your opinion over and over, you can think of nothing but an inspired resistance killing relief workers, Iraqi citizens, and American Soldiers, but you can't change the fact that they will come for us if left to grow strong.
Dan B. |
