Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neocon who wrote (118166)	10/31/2003 12:18:38 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) of 281500

to use all necessary means to uphold and implement resolution 660 (1990) and all subsequent relevant resolutions and to restore international peace and security in the area; You and I know that Neocon.. But it doesn't SPECIFICALLY STATE that military use should be used. "All necessary means" is kind of like the "Severe Consequences" language used in UNSC 1441. Neither of them prohibited the use of military force, nor did they mandate, or authorize the use of it. And that's been my point all along.. The UN has NEVER specifically authorized the use of military force between states. It has merely withheld its prohibition of some action. Everything else is left to the discretion of the member states willing to carry out the binding resolution, as to how they best accomplish the mission. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next