SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pezz who wrote (40677)11/2/2003 11:21:04 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) of 74559
 
Hello Pezz, <<with similar raw materials and workmanship the Chinese products will be considerably cheaper>> ... by my investigation, it turns out that even when the US manufacturer and the Chinese manufacturer uses the same exact raw material sourced from a third country, the raw material ends up cheaper by the time it arrives in any US-owned factory in China than in any Chinese-owned US factory ;0)

This above strangeness is not because the Chinese government subsidizes the US-owned Chinese factory and the US government is not supporting the Chinese-owned US factory, but because the middlemen between the raw material source (i.e. Swedish specialty tool steel) and the factories in the US are more expensive and less productive (value for cost) than the middlemen involved in China-based and whomever owned productions.

This is why the likes of Haim are out of fantastic solutions and so are reaching for nukes, all in the name of encouraging free choice and democracy ;0)

Chugs, Jay
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext