SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: michael97123 who wrote (15126)11/4/2003 9:51:29 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) of 793761
 
Regarding AIDS, it is not clear to me what the marginal difference in offensiveness is between the text from the script and what Reagan actually said, assuming the latter was accurately reported. So I'm not sure what the fuss is about. Surely not about whether it's an exact quote. Stories like that typically don't restrict themselves to exact quotes. The resulting movie would be unwatchable.

If the fuss is simply that there are unflattering things about a President in a movie, I can understand that concern. It's unfortunate when Presidents do unflattering things. And it's unfortunate when we point them out tastelessly. It would be better to hold that until after they've been dead for a while.

If the movie is just plain wrong on the substance, however, and is nothing but a smear job, well, that's horrid. I do not have enough information to assess whether that's the case or not. I can understand why one might be suspicious. Babs is definitely a hot button.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News