SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (118466)11/4/2003 10:52:41 AM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
a) Missiles are not WMD. b) Wanting WMD and having WMD are two different things. c) No WMD existed in Iraq as the US contemplated invasion. d) No missiles with long range capability (intercontinental) were delivered or on order. e) The source of the short and medium range missiles for Iraq was North Korea -- North Korea was and is the real WMD threat. f) North Korea has both long range missiles (intercontinental) and WMD that directly threaten the United States. g) North Korea is a known arms dealer to the least desirable people on this planet. h) No effective action on North Korea has been taken -- on the contrary there has been nothing more than fumbling and delay. i) Invading Iraq had nothing to do with eliminating a real WMD threat. j) The United States has a foreign policy that has not dealt with the real sources of the WMD threat.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News