Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (78638)	11/5/2003 5:46:29 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) of 82486

The question is whether a pba is ever necessary to save the life of the mother. If the baby can be partially delivered, then I can't imagine the scenario where it can't be fully delivered and the umbilical cord cut and the baby now either lives or dies on its own. I can't imagine the situation where it's possible to deliver a baby's head but not its body. Doesn't compute for me. The baby has to be withdrawn from the mother's body after it's killed -- why can't it be withdrawn before it's killed? Does anybody know whether there are cogent medical reasons why a PBA would ever be required, in preference to a complete birth, to protect the life of the mother?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next