SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (31196)11/8/2003 6:09:08 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (2) of 89467
 
George W Bush is no Winston Churchill. In fact, he has more in common with Adolph Hitler:

spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk

Although Adolf Hitler had the support of certain sections of the German population he never gained an elected majority.

Although Bush was eventually declared President of the USA, he received less votes than his Democrat rival in the 2000 election.

Soon after Adolf Hitler became chancellor he announced new elections. Hermann Goering called a meeting of important industrialists where he told them that the 1933 General Election could be the last in Germany for a very long time. Goering added that the NSDAP would need a considerable amount of of money to ensure victory. Those present responded by donating 3 million Reichmarks.

George W Bush has raised more money from his corporate backers for the November 2004 Presidential election than any other candidate in history - and the election is still a year away.

As Joseph Goebbels wrote in his diary after the meeting: "Radio and press are at our disposal. Even money is not lacking this time."

The Bush administration has deliberately set out to control the news media in the US - with a high degree of success. If you want to know what's really going on in the world, you have to look to the Internet or foreign news channels.

And, of course, Adolph Hitler and George W Bush were both staunch advocates of the doctrine of pre-emptive strikes - something Churchill would never have considered!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News