PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: American Spirit who wrote (490235)	11/10/2003 2:48:36 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (3) of 769670

I heard Edwards last night on Face the Nation and although I have always found him to be a strong democratic contender, I can see why he isn't gaining any traction. Basically, he spends half of the time in every interview explaining his position on why he supported the war - and his explanation sounds too much like one of the Bush apologists. "Saddam had to be stopped... he had weapons" blah blah blah. We've heard it before. I think what voters want to hear is what Dean is saying, that Bush overstated the entire thing and this mess has caused death and destruction. No need to defend your vote on the war, if you voted for it, just say the Intel was bad and you voted for a UN resolution and not a unilateral US invasion. That should do it. As long as these guys like Edwards keep explaining to voters that Saddam needed to be stopped, they will lose. Saddam is irrelevant now imho. I did see a clip of Kerry where he directly stated that the treasury was looted. Or something to that effect. That was good.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next